- Activities & Social
- Civic & Community
- Crime & Safety
- Give & Lend
- Local Politics
- Lost & Found
- 3 weeks, 2 days ago #3951
This will be the Sandy Martin discussion topic. Sandy Martin is the Labour Candidate for Ipswich, General Election 2017. It appears he doesn’t currently have a website, a bit worrying a month away from a General Election although I am sure it will all soon be revealed when he launches his General Election campaign.3 weeks ago #3963
Sandy Martin Ipswich Labour Candidate launches General Election campaign yesterday.
— Julian Gibbs (@julian_gibbs) May 7, 2017
— Kim Clements (@KC4Gainsborough) May 7, 2017
A slightly more low-key affair compared to Ben Gummer’s General Election campaign launch. The location appeared to be a closely guarded secret.
— Ipswich Labour (@IpswichLabour) May 6, 2017
I cannot help think Labour aren’t taking this too seriously at all. I have struggled to even find a website for Sandy Martin, today is 8/5/17 and the General Election is 8/6/17 – with people voting before that by postal vote. As of midday Monday, the local paper makes no mention online about the launch event. Unless they buck their ideas up, Ben Gummer could well increase his majority over the 2015 General Election or comfortably win with a small margin.
Elsewhere despite solely being a candidate, Sandy Martin interferes with French presidential election results…
— Sandy Martin (@sandyofipswich) May 8, 2017
It is too early to be decisive, but Ben Gummer would win comfortably if the General Election was today. What is going on?3 weeks ago #3966
but in other news he is following me on Twitter now!
very angry now, don't like inappropriate censorship,3 weeks ago #3967
It might be a good idea to ask him about the Northern Bypass, is he just following on from the Labour/Conservative Northern Relief Road/Northern Route from A14 to Henley Road… or a proper dual carriageway Northern Bypass from the A14 to A12?
We have to be realistic in realising the town MP’s party would need to have a majority to form a government to get the funding, but we will take what we can get.2 weeks, 6 days ago #3992
I have used the power of twitter to ask him and his local party where I can find his plans when he becomes our MP. If he is any good he will respond! Last time I did this with a major supermarket I was then on the phone with them 5 minutes later after they contacted me to sort out the issue, on a Sunday..! I don’t expect such a quick result but he went to the trouble of following me a few days ago so perhaps he can extend that to letting me in on his plans for Ipswich….
very angry now, don't like inappropriate censorship,2 weeks, 6 days ago #3994
I had done the same asking for his website via twitter. Be interesting whether we get a response.2 weeks, 5 days ago #4005
no response yet, I don’t think we are going to get one…
its like there is only one horse in this race, so far…
very angry now, don't like inappropriate censorship,2 weeks, 5 days ago #4006
On the news I discovered Labour’s Manifesto launch will be next week. We won’t hear anything until then at the very earliest.
I am not sure what Labour is playing at, why wouldn’t they want to take the seat of the person writing a rival party’s Manifesto? Especially a constituency which is rather strong for Labour in local elections?!
The Ipswich Star article said about him not being interested in additional responsibilities at Westminster (if I remember correctly, something to do with his age) but the voters might see that as insincere when he is holding back until the national manifesto and campaign has been started. The lack of website really bothers me it has to be said. Ben G had a website before the 2010 General Election campaign. Other councillors have one, Sandy has been one for 20 years…
What annoys me is Labour won’t take this seriously until Monday 5th June 2017… most of the ~17500 postal votes in Ipswich will have been received or in the process of being returned by then! Ben Gummer had close to 4000 majority (3733) in 2015… close to double from 2010 which had 2079. People will still vote for a prime minister in General Elections, Corbyn will struggle… it is a big gamble…2 weeks, 4 days ago #4018
OK, so no labour manifesto yet, apart from the leaked version, but Gummer locally hit the ground running and Sandy Martin so far as I can tell has yet to wake up to the fact he has an election to fight! A few photos of him with his party buddies waving banners and that’s about it. We need to know NOW where he stands on all the local issues so we can weigh these up against all the benshite we are already getting and start to ask questions. How about a local debate with all the candidates fielding questions from the public in the Corn Exchange? This is what we should be getting.. Instead we have one candidate alone hogging all the limelight making bold pronouncements with lots of data all skewed to make him look good.. and no one questioning it.
Or does no one here really care and it simply comes down to which party leader you dislike the least, and which of them with further your closet racist ambitions following Brexit…
very angry now, don't like inappropriate censorship,2 weeks, 4 days ago #4020
The leaked manifesto was a draft… and no doubt deliberate to get feedback. I expect some reform to the final manifesto, cutting perhaps unpopular policies and keeping the popular ones which the press and Tories haven’t criticised too much. Corbyn doesn’t appear to have understanding on how the world works; everything is much more complicated than the days of Robin Hood… lol
I am still confused, I didn’t think you could be both a councillor and an MP. Just came across this post on piston heads…
At the election here in Rochester, the Conservative candidate, Kelly Tolhurst, sent out a leaflet and in it she said that she ran a thriving business.
As a voter in this area, I asked on her Facebook page if she would be able to devote 100% of her time to being an MP and representing her constituents, or would the business still take up a portion of her time. The reply was that she would appoint people to run her business and she would devote all her time to her parliamentary duties.
Come election day, it turned out that as well as being the Conservative candidate for MP, she was also down as standing for the local elections as a councillor.
Someone posted on her Facebook page and asked which box should she tick to vote for her. The reply was “Both!”. Another person replied to that and said “But you told Calibrax you would devote all your time to being an MP”. No reply was given to this. So on Saturday I replied “Typical politician, tells you what you want to hear. She was clearly hedging her bets in case she lost and she would have the council job to fall back on. But I don’t expect you’ll get a reply, in fact I would not be surprised if this comment was deleted. It’s disgraceful.”
Sunday morning… as predicted, the comments are gone, deleted. And I can no longer post on the page.
Kelly Tolhurst was elected as MP, and also elected as a councillor.
Thoughts? Am I making too much of this? She’s lied to the electorate, and censored criticism, as well as taking two jobs when she should be concentrating on one or the other. Is this just what we should expect from politicians and we should just let them get away with it?
It seems you can be both. Some credit for David Ellesmere stepping down when he stood for election. Councillors are only part time but seems a bit odd to be stretched over both roles… I am sure there will be conflict between Westminster (H.o.Cs) and local meetings; although as he isn’t seeking additional responsibilities as an MP, he could well be highly regarded here… well, if you live in his Ward! it might be a good thing on reflection as it anchors him to local issues. I thought I must point out that I have been corrected from earlier incorrect assumptions! (I don’t think it is right especially as he is leader of Labour Group, so in theory he could be both an MP and leader of the council)
I have seen about 3 photos, that is all. As you say Ben hit the ground running, and although both candidates would wait for their manifestos to come out before pressing ahead, you would have thought Sandy would prevent Ben getting an unnecessary head start. Labour members are a funny bunch of people.
Does anyone know how the Ipswich Society Cornhill meeting went last night?1 week, 1 day ago #4130
in various tweets over last daY or so SandY Martin has come down firmlY for a Northern BYpass, against the big bridge, and for an island site link onlY.
Hi Nick- housing, NHS, Education, good jobs w decent pay and z Northern bypass for Ipswich. Lots more obviously – read Labour’s manifesto
The island site needs access. But the big bridge is an expensive white elephant- better to build Northern bypass/distributor road
and he has personally responded to me bY pm.
oh, and its just 1 laptop that won’t do small YYYYs, everY thing else seems to work OK>.!
very angry now, don't like inappropriate censorship,1 week, 1 day ago #4132
We don’t know what his idea for a Northern Bypass involves but it is a victory to avoid the Ben Bridge (Upper Orwell Crossings) getting built.1 day, 15 hours ago #4195
So here we are, not that long until the election. We’ve had at least 2 Ben’s Bulletins, we’ve had the TorY weak and wobblY leaflets, we have Lib Dem stuff, Ukip stuff but still zip, nadda, zero from Mr Martin. No knock on the door, no leaflet, no letter from CorbYn, not a thing. I need to know what Mr Martin’s plans for Ipswich are, I know what his boss is going to do, but no idea locallY. And no Facebook page I can consult, no Website I can read. I appreciate a lot of people are working hard to deliver leaflets, theY maY still get to us, but whY could someone in the local PartY set up a simple website or FAcebook Page? Or whY does the partY nationallY not do that for its candidates, it’s not hard. And a postal vote means we have to be making a decision shortlY…… I’ve have had interaction on Twitter but I’m still mostlY in dark about what SandY will be bringing to Ipswich if he get’s elected, whereas with his main opposition I have the complete picture now, (trees, trees, more trees, and a bridge that looks like trees!)
If he’s not going to knock on mY door should I go and knock on his?
very angry now, don't like inappropriate censorship,1 day, 14 hours ago #4199
My views on the Tories are clear. Ben Gummer isn’t one at heart but acts to be one to have a career.
Labour’s Ipswich General Election campaign is an absolute joke.
No website (not even a facebook) and Sandy Martin couldn’t do anything until his party allowed him to. He couldn’t do anything in regards to local issues as he had to wait for the manifesto, literature etc. from central party HQ outlining national policy. It is a direct carbon copy of 2015, fielding a candidate who is already in local government, so Labour Party members and voters have someone to choose. The proactive nature appears to be lacking in incredible detail. Sandy has been re-elected again as a local county councillor so he cannot really “lose” as such.
I cannot say I am surprised you haven’t received anything. They target specific areas. It is clear Ipswich Labour hasn’t had much campaign expenditure allocated to it – whether they are lacking monies or going to spend it elsewhere. Who knows.
Are you able to upload the rest of Ben’s Bulletin (on Ben Gummer topic)? As I haven’t received that either as of yet.
I have to admit I was sold (despite not really liking Labour or the candidate too much either) on the reallocation of Upper Orwell Crossings funding into the “Northern Bypass”. Ben lives in CS&NI (and London) so I cannot see him wanting a NBP. He lives closer to Dr Poulter than Ipswich. I am aware we need to work hard to get a Northern Bypass, neither party will do it off their own backs… as if that was the case it would have already happened. I am also very against career politicians. Ipswich already suffers from the Suffolk Conservatives (anti-Ipswich, the relative new boundaries splitting NW Ipswich away, two tier government) having one representative propping that up cannot continue without increased damage.
You must be logged in to reply to this topic.